Midnight in Paris (Woody Allen, 2011)
A
family travel to the French capital for business. The party includes a young
engaged couple who are forced to confront their differing views of a perfect
life.
Directing a
film per year since the early 1970’s, Woody Allen might become one of the most
productive directors of all time. Let’s not count John Ford’s early Westerns or the many short films some directors
may have directed in a year. Writing and directing a film every year at 76
years old might be a challenge since the Woodman has been occasionally accused
of repeating himself over and over again. However, Midnight in Paris, released in 2011, became one of his most
successful movies at the box office. So it was with high expectations I sat through the 94 minutes of this ode to the Paris of the 1920’s.
Gill (Owen Wilson) is about to marry Inez (Rachel McAdams), obviously the wrong
girl and moreover the wrong family. He is a daydreamer and he wants to escape
his screenwriter job to become a “real” writer and finish his novel. Gill is another
Woody Allen-like protagonist, about that there is an interesting fact about the names of his
characters. They are always short because he doesn’t like to lose too much time
writing them. But here I digress, the couple is visiting Paris with Inez’ parents (Mimi Kennedy & Kurt Fuller). They also encounter Carol (Nina Arianda) and Paul (Michael
Sheen) a couple of Inez’s friends. The latter is an old crush of the young
woman. Completely exasperated by Paul’s scholar bragging, Gill decides to go walk alone one
night. This will lead him to taste the dreams he always wanted.
Similarly
structured as The Purple Rose of Cairo,
Midnight in Paris is a movie for
cinephiles and daydreamers. The romantic depictions of Paris, the encounters
with historical figures are elements that I don’t want to spoil for those who haven’t seen
the picture. It feels like if Woody wanted to connect with his own nostalgia like his
very autobiographical movie Radio Days. The
Gill character, played by Owen Wilson, got all the ticks and fads that Allen did
when he used to star in his films. Wilson does a good job but it is more an
impersonation than actually a composition. Not having read on Allen’s directing
to Wilson might be a flaw for this review, but I tend to think that Wilson was on his own (no real directions from Allen)
and rewatched early films of Woody and did his best to catch the unique
character.
With my high
expectations, Midnight in Paris felt
a little flat for me and it is because the story isn’t that original or
surprising. Even if Darius Khondji’s
cinematography is warm and beautiful, the whole of the film lacked in depth and
the script could have used some fresh air. However, we are in a Woody Allen
movie and the recurring themes, the characters, and the unique Allenian feeling
is there. Recommended.
Good to read your reviews!
ReplyDeleteDon't know why but I have not seen this film yet. But I think it really is not Woody's best (maybe not one of the bests) movie. But he always is better than most of other Hollywood writers/directors.
It's far from his bests (Annie Hall, Manhattan, Crimes and Misdemeanors) but it is quite enjoyable and funny.
DeleteHe has a personal style of writing and this one thing I will never blame him for.
I liked this film MUCH more than you did. I had it as my number 3 movie of 2011. I liked everything about it, except Gil's in-laws, who are supposed to be unlikable.
ReplyDeleteIt's a very likeable film but I think I set expectations too high.
Delete