12 Years a Slave (Steve McQueen, 2013)
Solomon Northup (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a New York
State-born free negro who was kidnapped in Washington, D.C. in 1841 and sold
into slavery. He worked on plantations in the state of Louisiana for twelve
years before his release.
Based on Solomon
Northup’s novel of the same name, Steve
McQueen’s film Twelve Years a Slave
depicts most of the horrible moments of Northup’s slavery. As much as McQueen’s
previous efforts, both also starring Michael
Fassbender, Hunger and Shame were great films, his latest
starring Chiwetel Ejiofor, Brad Pitt,
Benedict Cumberbatch, Paul Dano, Paul Giamatti, Lupita Nyong’O,
Sarah Paulson, and Alfre Woodard is a much limited film in
its depth and reach. All that is stated with great respect towards the victims
of slavery and the crimes depicted in the reviewed movie. With high
expectations, the new McQueen film was on my list of most wanted films of 2013
way before it was nominated for the Oscars. Its presence there is understandable
since its treats heavy subjects and indulges the viewer to watch the
consequences of the crime of a nation. But without McQueen’s mastery at his
craft on the technical side, his storytelling ability was reduced as he
probably got too much into the subject matter of his plot and got swept away by
letting the basic concept of making his character suffer and make the audience
suffer with him.
This limits Northup’s development and at some point he
becomes almost unsympathetic since he is so passive and victimized. A better
character development with a tighter editing and more inner plots would have
been a great help to this technical wonder. However, this is the classic case
where every technical aspect of the film is more than well executed but his
story lacks in real depth and flavor. There’s a sense of the plot being stuck
in one place and the story seems not trimmed enough.
On the other side, performances are interesting but still
not worthy of Oscars. Fassbender, who I often praised, is too one sided as the
evil white man and I believe there were true assholes like him but I don’t see
a brilliant performance. Neither does Pitt, Ejiofor, or anyone. They were well
directed, but I think that it fells into known territories for a film that
treats slavery.
Overrated, yes. Mediocre, no. But it is not the masterpiece
that many critics are bragging about everywhere. It is watchable but also
forgettable since there’s no real surprise and it helps us to not forget those
ugly crimes that were committed in these horrible times. However, I don’t
believe that it paid homage to the victims like Schindler’s List did with the Holocaust.
No comments:
Post a Comment