Halloween (John
Carpenter, 1978)
A psychotic murderer institutionalized since
childhood for the murder of his sister, escapes and stalks a bookish teenage
girl and her friends while his doctor chases him through the streets.
Shot in
widescreen and used with great creativity, John
Carpenter’s low budget slasher classic is the perfect treat for the day of
the same name. Introducing to the world a young Jamie Lee Curtis, ironically the daughter of Tony Curtis and Janet Leigh there
are more than one link between both women.
The later, known for a particular murder scene in a shower in a “little”
film called Psycho, is one of the
major influences on Halloween. Jamie
Lee Curtis is nicknamed the Scream Queen, well she is the daughter of Janet
Leigh without a doubt. Both movies, Halloween
and Psycho, are violent in a way that
works on a more subtle level than the actual display of gore or gratuitous
violence. Just like Roger Ebert
wrote in his review of the film, which he strongly defended, it is easy to put
violence on film but it is not given to everyone to use it properly. Well,
Carpenter demonstrates all his talent and reach with his use of deep focus and
foreground and background action. The widescreen isn’t some sort of useless
effect like 3D or CGI. It involves the audience in a way that we feel we are
stick into the picture with the teenagers.
Those
teens are portrayed as teens like we were and just like they are today. I couldn’t
help myself but to think that the constant ringing of the phones reminded me
that if it was shot today it would have been made with cell phones. But I
digress, those teens are Michael Myers’ favorite victims: he seems to loath
them especially when they fool around and they are having sex. The use of
hand-held camera to illustrate his point of view is particularly efficient even
if, by today’s standards, it has been used until burned out. Like
aforementioned, the violence and the horror is one thing in a classic film like
Halloween. But Carpenter’s real
achievement if you ask me is the setting of the atmosphere and tone for Horror.
The bleak but realistic day light scenes are very interesting and just like the
opening sequence of Evil Dead or the
long tracking shots of The Shining,
those are the elements that make the difference between a good and a great
Horror film.
Another
important aspect of the ambiance is the simplistic omnipresent synthesizer
score that brings an element of thrill and a constant fear of a possible scare coming.
Usually,
I don’t recall the context of my viewings but this one was almost perfect I was
alone in the dark in early October, my wife was sleeping and the night was just
like in the dark scenes of the movie. Just like little Tommy and Lindsay, who
watched Howard Hawks’ The Thing that John Carpenter would
remake few years later, I was watching Halloween
scared in the dark but I continued to watch because when I decided to sit and
watch this film I knew I would get a nice movie experience. Many would say it
was about time I watched this film, but I really appreciated this film. In
fact, every John Carpenter movie I ever saw I actually liked. His films
shouldn’t get snobed because they are Horror or slashers, they are superb
pieces just like Alfred Hitchcock used to make with Psycho and The Birds.
They might not be as deep or as Freudian, but their effect are in the same
vein. Highly recommended.
Good review Michael. Not as scary the numerous times you see it, but from a film-making stand-point, it's pretty influential and smart in the way it barely shows blood or gore, and still has the right to be scary. Those sequels all blew though.
ReplyDeleteHaven't seen the sequels and I think they would kill it for me. I prefer to stay on my impression of the original. Thanks for commenting Dan!
DeleteI had very low expectations when I first watched this- which was only last year. But I was so pleasantly surprised by it. It's a very good slasher film.
ReplyDeleteIt is a very good film indeed! I actually enjoyed it a lot more than I thought I would too.
Delete